International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment.
Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Tremendous advantages has been brought by tourist from abroad to a great number of places, however, its impact on environment and local people is being concerned. This essay will illustrate how the drawbacks caused by tourism completely overshadow the benefits it brought to the country.
There are two main benefits of tourism in local area. The first one is that it brings a great amount of money to the locals. Simply put, tourist attractions are promoted internationally to other countries in the world by the government, so people in the territory will receive more working opportunities. For instance, due to its great frame around the world, Khao Yai National Park brings numerous travelers to the local souvenir stores. Another positive issue from global tourist is the development of the places they visit. A large quantity of money earned in a spot will catch local authorities' attention, and therefore they will govern and release some policy to take a good care of the spots.
This situation, however, contributes to two primary negative effect on a local citizen and environment. Firstly, non-local people will make a great change in conservative cultures. For example, in Bangkok, it seems that the local has changed the way they work to earn money from visitors. Making merit, an authentic Buddhism ceremony, has been transformed to an expensive photo-taking activity. Secondly, visitors act as a key factor for the increase in quantity of waste which ruins the nature and lives in the area. Some locations are adapted to be trash dropping spot due to a great deal of garbage made by international tourists.
In conclusion, the previously-mentioned benefits of international tourism are good. But, the change of local tradition and lifestyle, and a dramatic increase of waste cannot be overlooked by any level. Therefore, the disadvantages of oversea visitors far outweigh the advantages.
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 90
- The infographics below show employment statistics for UK residents by English language proficiency in 2013 78
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 588, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authorities'' or 'authority's'?
Suggestion: authorities'; authority's
...money earned in a spot will catch local authorities attention, and therefore they will gove...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25163398693 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03314630454 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575163398693 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7702294806 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5294117647 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201209422202 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636583463803 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590529815515 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133140932159 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445675923977 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.