In the past, shopping was a routine domestic task. Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby.
Recently, the alternative standpoint of shopping’s roles has become a debatable issue in many parts of the world. In conventional ways, it was a common belief that shopping was indispensable in terms of buying ingredients to cook or artificial households to meet domestic requirements. Nevertheless, in the modern era, I maintain that shopping is highly-regarded as a pastime in a wide social circle and this trend can result in negative consequences.
To be with, many people nowadays consider shopping as a hobby since they realize that it can lead to putting down one’s pressure effectively. In other words, citizens in modern times always have to deal with various assignments and deadlines, therefore, listing something they express a desire to own and going out to purchase them can present powerful impacts on people’s emotions as well as work productivity. According to the Oxford survey, approximately 52% of adults and teenagers, who can outperform and achieve more award-winning in comparison with their rivals, go shopping whenever they feel stress and uncomfortable on a daily basis.
On the other hand, most people living in cities splurge shopping regularly to satisfy their requirements even purchasing some items, which are even no need of using. To put in other words, citizens spend a large amount of money on luxurious products without thinking carefully for boasting with each other about their advantageous financial backgrounds. According to Hobby Club, roughly 87% of companies have to withstand bankruptcy because of extravagant daily habits. To be more precise, they spend higher than 80% of their income on costly items, and this illogical division can entail the financial burden.
To sum up, while regarding shopping as a hobby can bring some benefits to mature and immature generations, it can contribute to a lot of striking downfalls to households’ finance. I suggest that people have to be sanity to spend money on everyday needs effectually to avoid some serious consequences.
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000 72
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 78
- Some people feel that certain workers like nurses doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of the work that t 78
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 78
- The maps below show a plan of a city in 1950 and at the present Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, as well as, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34482758621 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10393903849 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617554858934 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.1423673873 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.083333333 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5833333333 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209064282467 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738810851818 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634081410908 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123378272373 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554960823212 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.