Team activities can teach more skills for life than those activities which are played alone.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In recent decades, the question of which type of activities can teach more important skills for life, has become a topic of discussion. Although team activities are beneficial in many cases, personal activities should be considered essential for everyone to learn most life skills.
There are a number of reasons why solo activities are necessary for developing one’s skills. First, it is true that in teamwork, tasks are broken into different parts and assigned to each member, meaning that each person only knows clearly about his or her part without any knowledge of other parts. Meanwhile, by doing those tasks alone, one can be able to completely understand how to cope with the whole task, which develops problem solving skills. Second, individual works help one to boost independence skills. Plenty of evidence suggests that when working in a team, members tend to lean towards one key member, which discourages individuals to brainstorm themselves.
Another compelling reason not to say that group activities can teach more important skills than personal ones is that teamwork cannot be useful in some circumstances. First, if people without the same goal work in a group, the more likely they will end up arguing all the time and getting unwanted results. The implication of this is that if one does not have like- minded team mates, they cannot be able to learn anything from working with each other. Second, there are a variety of skills could be learnt better through personal activities than group ones. For example, after several times of fall, a child can learn how to walk by himself without the help of anyone.
In conclusion, although it is clear that teamwork is an indispensable part in our lives, personal activities play an important role in learning crucial skills for life. In order to bring out one’s potential, we need to find the best mix of the two types.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-05 | Trâm Nguyễn | 73 | view |
- How will this scholarship contribute to the organization s human resource development needs 11
- 1 How will this scholarship contribute to the organization s human resource development needs
- Watching a live performance such as a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Team activities can teach more skills for life than those activities which are played alone To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 508, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...are a variety of skills could be learnt better through personal activities than group ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in many cases, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02857142857 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59359445063 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606349206349 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5622895947 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.142857143 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284453401048 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981476047876 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841858927635 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183403322113 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0872317609958 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.