Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in the number of masses believing that the best measure to control traffic congestion and pollution is to increase the fuel cost. However, I think that this will not be approved as a wise decision to overcome this concern and this essay would shed light on some other effective solutions.
To commence with, there are deluge of arguments on favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that increasing the price of petrol will create obstacles for industrial businesses, because oil and gas are the imperative sources of industries and it would influence the factories very adversely.It cannot only lead to increase the value of marketing goods, but also give birth to other problems. For instance, the study results published by the government of Australia in March 2014 and April 2016 clearly indicate that 80% of the manufacturing companies are sensitive to petrol, which means this will become herculean task for industrialists to cope up with the rise of petrol. Therefore, taking this step will cause to new problems.
On the other hand, there are some actions that can be taken to reduce the traffic jams and pollution. The primary one lies in the fact that government should rebuild the broken roads and construct some new roads to limit vehicles on the highways. Apart from this, there should be more availability of public transport in everywhere around the clock and schedule frequency should be more available. To site an example, recent survey has been done in Canada shows that there is 50% decrease in the congestion of vehicles by introducing the more buses to the society. Due to this, people do not prefer to drive their own cars. Moreover, scientists should research on less polluted resources such as solar power and natural gas instead of fossil fuels.
In conclusion, although increasing the petrol cost can be controlled the traffic jams as well as pollution, I believe that this is not the great deal to make in order to resolve this and other steps can be effective to take.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-29 | m_sepahi@ymail.com | 11 | view |
| 2021-08-14 | pourya | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-22 | lunhongquan | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-24 | zukky | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-29 | ayofigo | 73 | view |
- People today do not feel safe either at home or when they are out What are the causes What are the solutions 78
- Some people say that in all levels of education from primary schools to universities too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills 89
- Computers are becoming an essential part of school lessons Do the advantages of this outweigh the negatives 89
- Children today play very violent games This must be the reason for the increase in violence and crime in most major cities of the world What are your opinions on this 89
- Missions to explore space are hugely expensive and there are problems on Earth which demand attention The number of these missions needs to be reduced Do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 29, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deluges'?
Suggestion: deluges
...lutions. To commence with, there are deluge of arguments on favour of my stance. Th...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
... influence the factories very adversely.It cannot only lead to increase the value ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, so, therefore, well, apart from, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9375 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66005591464 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582386363636 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.0959483791 49.4020404114 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.692307692 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0769230769 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157527845651 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495896797673 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433846014961 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100746485428 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031921301907 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.