Genetic engineering is a dangerous trend. It should be limited.
To what extent do you agree?
----------------------------
These days, to serve the demands of civilization in the era of technology, a biological researcher tends to regard genetic engineering as one of the most crucial scientific fields. However, some world-renowned scientists now affirm that working with genes is a harmful on-going trend that should be eliminated.
The framework of the opposition side comes from their experience when working with genes. It lies in the fact that ADN or some other branched-chain acids, which constitute genes, are sensitive compounds. Moreover, biologists have proved that those compounds contain the blueprint of humans’ lives. Therefore, eccentric changes in the chain of ingredients can create novel organism species, which may develop hazardous diseases or unprecedented pandemic. In The United States, biological weapons are innovated based on the theory of Genetically Modified Organisms, so the US military can use those substances to invade other countries. In the Vietnam war, for instance, with the appearance of “Orange” toxic chemical pervaded by the US military, many people were harmed and become disabled.
However, it is undeniable that genetics engineering is the only way to develop medicine. Civilization, including biological development, is the process in which negative effects are inevitable, and people need to deal with the drawbacks to making the world better. Without the innovations of new generations of genetics as well as new kinds of bacteria, humans are probably unable to produce antibiotics or vaccines to cease the widespread health problems. Although genetics engineering may cause more new diseases, scientists can simultaneously find ways to treat them and even seek new methods to treat the initial widespread physical issues. Meanwhile, in the world without genetics developments, people cannot get access to state-of-the-art genetic laboratories to experiments and work with genes to solve burning issues.
To put it in a nutshell, I strongly agree that genetic engineering must be maintained and developed due to the demand of humans’ lives. However, the use of genes needs to be meticulous and resolute.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines Should parents be made by law to immunise their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children 73
- In many countries children are engaged in different kinds of paid work Some people regard this as completely wrong while others consider it a valuable work experience important for learning and taking responsibility What is your opinion 73
- Genetic engineering is a dangerous trend It should be limited To what extent do you agree 75
- Genetic engineering is a dangerous trend It should be limited To what extent do you agree 89
- Genetic engineering is a dangerous trend It should be limited To what extent do you agree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 270, Rule ID: ON-GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...rm that working with genes is a harmful on-going trend that should be eliminated. Th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1851.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69538461538 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37782435773 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8154716459 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.4 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152984724852 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498118418221 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542789756789 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0874932370671 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709627055548 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.