The impact that environmental problems have had on our daily life, and society in general, is undeniable. No doubt it will become even greater as the scope of which continues to grow, and as high energy-consuming industries become more and more prevalent, and so inevitable that virtually nobody will be able to ignore it. While some people believe that the traditional energy sources such as coal and oil is an necessary prerequisite for enery supply because of its lower price, a cleaner energy should play more important role if we consider a long term benefit.
First of all, the traditional sources is not really cheap as it looks like if we combine the cost of obtaining with the consequences. Recently, we often notice some news about marine pollution caused by oil leakage, air pollution in developing countries, greenhouse effect caused by burning fossil fuels, and the list will go on. Unlike the process of consuming coal and oil by simply burning them, our society have to spend tremendously numerous time and money to cope with these deleterious effects. Therefore, not merely is there the cost of acquiring the traditional sources and the cost of handling the side effects should be calculated as well. Thus, the tradional sources could not be cheaper than cleaner energy.
Additionally, the tradtional energy sources cannot support the development of our society for a long time. Some cutting-edge researches reveal that the remaining oil in the earth could only be exploited for two or three decades. Obviously, it is necessary to switch from oil and coal to other energy sources which can help a sustainable development. Considering the cost of acquisition and the impact on environment, clean energy, such as nuclear energy, wind energy and solar energy, is one of the most suitable kind of energy to replace fossil fuel among a large range of potential energy. And this kind of clean energy could be supposed as unlimited in the earth.
Finally, we have no definite evidence to say that human beings can adapt to an environment filled with pollution, but it is absolutely true that a better environment could help us live better. Clean energy allows us confidence to keep away from pollution and protect the cherished earth. In brief, using a cleaner energy to protect the environment is better than the traditional energy sources which seems like less expensive.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Telephone has greater influence on people s lives than television has 76
- Some people suggest that using a cleaner energy to protect the environment is better but some people say the traditional energy sources such as coal and oil is less expensive what is your suggestion 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. 73
- Some people suggest that using a cleaner energy to protect the environment is better but some people say the traditional energy sources such as coal and oil is less expensive what is your suggestion 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for government to spend money on building modern housing than on preserving historic or traditional buildings and homes 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 410, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... energy sources such as coal and oil is an necessary prerequisite for enery supply...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, look, really, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in brief, in general, kind of, no doubt, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1997.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05569620253 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79046606308 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539240506329 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0133085452 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.8125 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6875 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4375 5.45110844103 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314772412766 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964678073392 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089049708134 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186252959927 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588123792914 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.