the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia
The pie charts reveal information on the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in 2010. Units are measured in percent
From an overall perspective, one of the most outstanding features is that there was a significant difference in the percentage of money spent on households. Actually, the figures given for the percentage of housing in Malaysia accounted for the largest one among five chosen selected groups, with 34%. Nevertheless, heath care was found to be the lowest one. These figures comprised of only 6% in Japan and 3% in Malaysia.
Surprisingly, the rate of housing made up the highest one in Malaysia, with 34%, whereas the remaining figures for housing use ranged 21% in Japan. Conversely, the percentage of other goods and services in Japan seemed to be the highest, constituting 29%, whereas the figures in Malaysia comprised of 26% - stood at the third.
It is interesting to note that money spent for food stood at the second both two countries, with 27% in Malaysia and 24% in Japan. The number of transport in Japan was found to be constituting 20%, being significantly higher two times than that of Malaysia (10%)
- The maps below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 73
- table the prensent of national expenditure in Ireland italy and spain 61
- The line graph reveals information on the amount of three kinds of spread margarine low fat and reduced spreads and butter which were consumed over 26 years from 1981 to 2007 67
- the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia 78
- ELECTRONIC GOODS AND SERVICES BY AGE OF HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gher two times than that of Malaysia 10%
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, conversely, if, nevertheless, second, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02604166667 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89808267506 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578125 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3413098072 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.222222222 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318476520982 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148938262805 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166086270668 0.0843802449381 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225690044603 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154823576596 0.0819641961636 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.