The bar chart compares the proportion of Americans who had meals at fast food eateries in three separate years (2003, 2006 and 2013).
Overall, most Americans went to fast food restaurants once a week, between 2003 and 2006, and once or twice a month in 2013. People eating fast food daily accounted for the lowest percentage in all three years.
In 2003 and 2006, more than one third of Americans ate at fast food restaurants once a week, but the number decreased to around 27% in 2013. The proportion of Americans consuming fast food once or twice a month declined by 5% during the first three years before rising to 33% in 2013.
The proportion of people who had fast food as a meal several times a week fluctuated between around 16% and 20%, and these percentages were slightly higher than the figures for those eating this food a few times a year. Daily eaters and those who had never eaten in fast food establishments before accounted for very small percentages, ranging from just 3% to 5%.
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the production and processing of milk and dairy products for commercial sale Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 46
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. 73
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. 78
- The diagrams below shows the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years Eohippus 40 million years agoMesohippus 30 million years agoMerychippus 15 million years agoHorse modernThe evolution of the horse with particular emphasis on t 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 13.1623246493 8% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 1615.20841683 51% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 177.0 315.596192385 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67231638418 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44523794572 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 176.041082164 53% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531073446328 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 233.1 506.74238477 46% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.0664048344 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.142857143 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.42857142857 7.06120827912 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295749570005 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156105003926 0.084324248473 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586873594149 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202363096759 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490199107605 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 50.2224549098 142% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 78.4519038076 32% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.