Nowadays, it is thought that there are hardly any differences among cities around the world. This similarity is caused by many reasons and this development is proved to exert negative implications on human life.
There are some reasons to explain this trend. First, since globalization facilitates the global trade and flows of investments, businessmen could expand their business and penetrate foreign markets without any trade barriers. Therefore, it is normal to catch the sight of multinational companies or international brands, such as Samsung, Facebook, McDonald , or Starbucks in any metropolises across the globe, leading to the unexpected similarity. Second, assimilation is also a driving cause of identical cities. For example, Vietnam was a French colony for nearly a decade, thus many building designs in Vietnam have been tremendously affected by the Western styles.
It can be seen that this trend is accompanied by a multitude of negative impacts. Globalization will pose hazards to the diversity of the culture. When people all over the world prefer synchronized customs and practices, they will leave minority cultures on the brink of extinction, resulting in the loss of national heritages and the disappearance of the multicultural world. Besides, the similarity among cities will have destructive effects on the tourism industry. Since all cities share the same styles and designs, people may lose interest in exploring and traveling to new places. Therefore, countries mainly depending on the hospitality sector will suffer from an economic downturn.
In conclusion, the monotony results from globalization and assimilation, and it has severely affected many aspects of life. The government should take urgent measures to protect cultural values and facilitate the tourism industry
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Lhva1000
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 356, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nds, such as Samsung, Facebook, McDonald , or Starbucks in any metropolises across...
^^
Line 2, column 669, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndously affected by the Western styles. It can be seen that this trend is accomp...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61904761905 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05956112433 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648351648352 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0444677187 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.266666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0950024066323 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0268441310707 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327533579737 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.054611194602 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546206352545 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.