Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent decades, the conservation of wild animals has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although those animals have a few places to live because of the industrialized world, they should be protected due to their positive impacts on this planet.
There are several reasons why people believe that wild animals have no place in this century. First, since the total number of populations is growing, humans tend to destruct forests to take up lands for housing. This means that deforestation could lead to a falling rate of wild animals such as monkeys or birds, which exert a detrimental impact on biodiversity. Second, rampant illegal hunting is also is the main culprit for the extinction of wild animals. In fact, in some countries, regulations of protecting wildlife are not strict enough, leading to an increasing number of unlawful poachers and dealers.
Nevertheless, it is necessary for governments to preserve those animals as protecting their habitats means protecting human lives. For instance, rainforests produce oxygen and make a positive contribution to reducing the risk of flood, which implies that nature could save human beings. If natural habitats are destroyed, the costs of managing the resulting changes could be much higher than the costs of conservation. Therefore, it is important to protect wild animals and their habitats to maintain the natural balance.
In conclusion, some wild animals have vanished as a result of the development of the industrialized world. However, it is necessary to put more resources into preservation projects to maintain the natural resources of the planet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-11 | Corn Cake | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | Corn Cake | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Aung | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | ielts_tony | 56 | view |
| 2022-10-31 | Charles Le | 56 | view |
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that would be a waste of money Discuss both the 92
- nowadays children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things What are the reasons and what measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or creative things 89
- Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 61
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32558139535 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95602040033 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596899224806 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.4035077558 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.692307692 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19736832196 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739343381652 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596605967922 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124978734596 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238877581936 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.