Some people say that the increasing business and cultural contact between countries is a positive development, while others think that many countries will lose their national identities as a result. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Nowadays, international commerce and interaction between various culture have resulted in faster growth of one nation, but some people believe that along with such development, there is a negative impact on the individual identifies of many countries. Although the latter view can be sometimes true, in my view, business and cultural exchanges between countries surely have more positive effects than drawbacks.
On the one hand, those who are worried about international trade and cultural contact argue that this trend is detrimental to the culture and tradition of many countries in a number of ways. In fact, young generation tends to prefer foreign songs, films and TV shows rather than their traditional folksongs, dramatics and dances thanks to the process of integration. As a consequence, the dominance of affluent countries' cultures speeds up the disappearance of other's cultural specialities. For example, occident costumes, foods and lifestyles have gradually penetrated into Vietnamese people's daily life, taking the place of time-honoured values. In addition, in order for borderless commerce to be effective, it is necessary to unite a worldwide language, which results in people from distinct regions speaking the same language.
On the other hand, widening international exchanges, both in the field of business and culture, having exerted positive influences on a nation as well as its people. According to estimates, corporations in developed countries investing in underdeveloped regions have created a great number of jobs and helped inhabitants of these countries, especially the young generation, access to advance education. For example, the arrival of software and outsourcing companies like Samsung or Intel has created enormous jobs for engineers in VietNam. Secondly, in the area of flourishing tourism, a nation is given the ability to promote its image in other's eyes. Disseminating cultural quintessence including cuisine, costume and festival can be preserved and brought into play.
In conclusion, although the globalisation poses challenges in protecting and promoting the tradition and national identity, it has huge benefits in term of economic development and cultural evolution of the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-31 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-12-02 | uyenmia | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-02 | uyenmia | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | tnhu9400 | 84 | view |
| 2020-11-30 | driverhiepkhachvnteam | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23 65 in di erent occupations in one UK town Ashby and in the UK as a whole in 2008 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 89
- The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008. 73
- The given bar graphs show the extent of cash that individuals in France, Germany and England spent on nourishment and different items in 1998 and 2008. 73
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 374, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntries, especially the young generation, access to advance education. For example...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1905.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70359281437 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11847439787 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62874251497 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.5956633068 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.538461538 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6923076923 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255014821263 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790476279848 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05767837693 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142265783888 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588168733595 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.69 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.