Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is argued that government funds should not be invested in art and cultural activities. Other people, however, believe that backing art and culture is advantageous. In my view, I agree that funding for art and culture is beneficial and this essay will discuss both points of view.
On the one hand, many people think that spending on cultural activities is waste because there are more burning social issues need to be addressed. For example, the poor-rate in many countries, especially Africa, is one of the major reason for the increased number of deaths. South Sudan alone, having more 1.1 million people live in poor status, more than 100,000 residents in here are at risk of dying of malnutrition. Using money for food aid purposes and supporting agriculture would help save thousands of lives. In addition, unemployment is also a painful problem in society and this is harmful to the national economy. Therefore, authorities should use their resources to combat this issue such as expenditure on education to improve labour quality, organize vocational sessions and support businesses. So, there is no point to waste governmental budget for recreational purposes.
On the other hand, some people in favour of the government's expenditure on art and culture due to the great benefits they bring. Firstly, in the era of globalization, it helps to preserve a country's unique culture. For instance, water puppet festivals in VietNam have helped conserve the distinct Vietnamese arts since the 11th century. Furthermore, cultural events attract an influx of tourist to the country and that clearly bring about economic values. For example, Foreigners visit Germany for beer festivals and the Carnival in Rio de Janerio, an annual festival promoting Brazilian culture, injects billions of dollars into economies of both countries every year thanks to tourism.
In conclusion, although there are people opposed to government investing in art and culture programs, it is necessary for the authorities to continue encouraging them because of their undeniable benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-29 | gtuez | 89 | view |
| 2021-05-15 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 89 | view |
| 2020-09-08 | longpm2k | 84 | view |
| 2020-05-25 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 95 | view |
| 2020-05-01 | jojilover | 67 | view |
- Nowadays sports is a big business with high earnings for professional sportspeople and companies involved both financially and other ways Is this a positive or negative development for sports 89
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture Discuss both views and give your own opinion 95
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 89
- The table and graph below give information about cinema attendance in Australia between 1994 and 2002 73
- Given high unemployment rate it is recommended that the government only provide primary education and no secondary education What do you think 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ther hand, some people in favour of the governments expenditure on art and culture due to t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34862385321 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84684679166 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636085626911 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6506013704 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.3125 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412312682338 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118005651631 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0945331510422 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240428146367 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106345538973 0.056905535591 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.