The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe, compared to the EU average, in 2009 and 2010.
The bar chart compares six EU countries in terms of changes in the propotion of fuel used in transport field from 2009 to 2010.
Overall, it is immediately obvious that the amount of fuel used with the aim of transportation in 2020 was greater than that in 2009 and vice versa to the rest except for Austria. In addition, EU average consumed fuel higher compared to each land apart from Slovakia in both two years and Austria in 2020.
To commence with, the propotion of fossil fuel was prone to increase in three countries, namely Italy, France and Greece, nevertheless the differences were insignificant and were lower than average percentage. To be more detalied, Greece, consuming the lowest fossil fuel among six lands, went up from over one percentage to two percentages. Similarly, the others nations rose by nearly one percentage.
By contrast, Slovakia and Spain decreased utilizing fuel in transport by aproximately two percentages and under one percentage respectively. Although Slovakia went down significantly from nearly 9% to 6,5%, it ranked the first in both two years and was much higher than EU average. Finally, Autria was unchanged with more than 5% over the course of one year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-13 | Phạm Thanh Tùng | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-13 | Phạm Thanh Tùng | 56 | view |
| 2022-02-15 | thanhtam2709 | 89 | view |
- The development of science and technology benefit our life However scientists cannot find effective solutions for what they created Do you agree or disagree 65
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played by boys and girls in new zealand in 2002 84
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel Do you agree or disagree 67
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...percentage. To be more detalied, Greece, consuming the lowest fossil fuel among s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, nevertheless, similarly, apart from, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11055276382 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82129367267 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572864321608 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0245408007 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216409399042 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932896014895 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110731335758 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16895702683 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13031298207 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.