Despite huge improvements in healthcare, the overall standard of physical health in many developed countries is now falling.
What could be the reason for this trend, and what can be done to reverse it?
Although there are numerous progress and developments in health fields, the decline in citizen’s health in rich nations has been an alarming issue. The main factor of the drop in standard of health is a lifestyle and the government should take this issue into account.
Firstly, people’s way of living is the main reason for decreasing the physical health level in developed countries. Because of the hectic pace of life nowadays, people can easily cause anxiety and stress which will lead to some diseases such as heart attack or stroke. Furthermore, unhealthy eating habit is another harmful reason. The increase of fast food consumption can be explained by its convenience and addictive taste which has directly affected their health. It contains extra calories that have little nutrition but can increase your bad cholesterol and make you gain weight unintentionally.
In order to solve this problem, it is essential to get involvements in both individuals and governments. On the one hand, authorities should raise awareness of citizens about a healthy lifestyle through campaigns and social media. By spending more money on facilitating equipment at public parks as well as organizing wholesome activities about the benefits of playing sports, outdoor exercises. On the other hand, every single person should prefer to eat organic food instead of food and fizzy drinks praxis. For example, families need to spend more time with each other and manage to cook by themselves instead of buying junk food.
In conclusion, an imbalanced style of living and an unhealthy diet have made overall health conditions in developed countries go down. However, I strongly believe that more physical exercises and fresher meals are able to mitigate the problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-29 | haphuongpham49 | 84 | view |
| 2014-05-11 | Thaer | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that we cannot learn anything from the past for our life today while others believe that history is a valuable source of information to understand human s life Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain Others say films should have educational value Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- Shops in the countryside are fewer and fewer so people tend to go to stores in the towns and cities and then lead to their inconvenient life Car use also causes pollution Is this phenomenon more harmful than the end 84
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 496, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'drinks'' or 'drink's'?
Suggestion: drinks'; drink's
... organic food instead of food and fizzy drinks praxis. For example, families need to s...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...meals are able to mitigate the problem.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78155137367 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68458781362 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.9021175733 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.285714286 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161089041526 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483304691485 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444814190229 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910281324376 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445216991587 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 496, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'drinks'' or 'drink's'?
Suggestion: drinks'; drink's
... organic food instead of food and fizzy drinks praxis. For example, families need to s...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...meals are able to mitigate the problem.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78155137367 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68458781362 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.9021175733 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.285714286 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161089041526 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483304691485 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444814190229 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910281324376 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445216991587 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.