Shops in the countryside are fewer and fewer, so people tend to go to stores in the towns and cities, and then lead to their inconvenient life. Car use also causes pollution. Is this phenomenon more harmful than the end?
It is becoming more popular for people to shop at central stores. While it is argued that buying goods from large town-center shops could be beneficial for in-town businesses. In various ways, I am more convinced that the drawbacks are more serious and should not be overlooked.
On the one hand, it is very beneficial for a small business owner to set up a store in a shopping center which is located in prime and easily accessible locations. Firstly, this helps out-of-town businesses to make more profit by opening a store in the town center because it provides a wide range of customers. Supermarkets in cities attract their purchasers with several offers including groceries, clothing, electronics, and much more under one roof, people from rural parts of the country initially find it fascinating and get habitual. Secondly, the preference of going to towns helps the automobile industry grow because people who do not have cars must buy one to travel to these stores on the outskirts. This leads to boost economic growth there.
On the other hand, it is true that shopping at distant destinations could have several inconveniences to buyers. People have to spend more money on petroleum costs and time to get to those places, which accordingly makes them unable to strike a balance in their budget. Apart from the cause of inconvenient life, environmental problems caused by cars and other vehicles that are used for shopping are also more devastating. Due to the increase in the usage of private vehicles, the needs of fuels such as coal, petroleum, and oil are also grown up. Thus, the more cars hit the road, the more toxic gases emitted into the atmosphere. This also contributes to such environmental issues as air pollution, the greenhouse effect, and global warming.
In conclusion, shopping at distant shops could have a negative impact on people’s lives because of its money and time consuming and the harmful affections into the air.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, thus, while, apart from, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0245398773 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76807477256 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585889570552 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8228472853 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.2 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27864503153 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875079238291 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493474678293 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150940347569 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477376030494 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.