Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but no local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
Museums and historical locations are generally drawn tourists when they first visiting despite the local people’s low attendance at these attractions. Some explanations will be put forward before solutions can be taken to tackle this problem.
There are a number of reasons why the local communities show no interest in museums or historic places. First, the local inhabitants might have been brought up in those areas and have had a good understanding of the history of their country, so they might find it unattractive to visit. As a result, such destinations are commonly more appealing to newcomers than to the locals. Moreover, people usually need to pay for a high entrance fee which prevents residents who want to come around frequently but living under difficult conditions. Even though it has a far less profound impact than the first cause mentioned, it discourages the locals to drop by.
Some measures can be prompted to promote the local’s attendance rate at buildings for historic relics and museums. In order to capture more attention from indigenous people, museums and historical side sites should promote not only the historical values but also the aesthetic values of it. Enhancing the awareness of people by showing them the beautiful side of these landscapes can encourage citizens to visit regularly. Furthermore, the free entrance should be offered to people living in the neighborhood where the museums and monuments are located. This approach seems to have a humble effect; however, it conveys a message to local dwellers about how important they are to the existence of such places.
In conclusion, historical areas and museums can be uninteresting for local citizens because they can be too familiar with the culture that these places depict. To better this, by giving more fascinating aspects of the sites and proving the concern about the locals' role can make the situation better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-02 | haphuongpham49 | 89 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 73
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think it is better to work for different organisations 61
- Many people say that universities should only offer to young students with the highest marks others say they should accept people of all ages even if they did not do well Discuss both views and give your opinions 89
- Some people believe that young people know about international pop and movie stars but know very little about famous people from the history in their own country Why is this How can more interest be created in young people to gain more knowledge about the 73
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 259, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'locals'' or 'local's'?
Suggestion: locals'; local's
...sites and proving the concern about the locals role can make the situation better. ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23948220065 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78873906886 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608414239482 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4472300578 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.642857143 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420019924415 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127305609171 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722851041518 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256733938242 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046233876355 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.