Some people work for long hours and hard to achieve success and some give importance to free time for them. Give your opinion and discuss your views.
Recently, the phenomenon of achieving success by hard-working and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of free time are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that hard-working people can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, achieving success by working hardly can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of sophisticated persons, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of leisure time. Thus, beneficial ramifications of successful works are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, working hard can supply the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of dead-end jobs are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described unsuccessful people. Hence, predicted outcomes of long-hour works are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of achieving success by hard-working far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of free time prove the significance of responsible individuals, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-02 | honorrr | 85 | view |
| 2021-01-29 | honorrr | 55 | view |
| 2021-01-29 | honorrr | 77 | view |
| 2020-07-09 | Alireza.r.m | 80 | view |
| 2020-02-29 | Alireza.r.m | 77 | view |
- Globalization is important What is your opinion Give your reasons 93
- What is your idea about lazy journalism that is commonplace in the digitalized world 77
- What is the role of writing theater plays and discussing ancient writings in the study of high school students 68
- Should wealthy nations help poor countries with food and education or is it the responsibility of poor nations to improve their condition 85
- The only effective way to deal with unemployment is to introduce rapid urbanization To what extent do you agree with it 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1271.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 222.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72522522523 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28440162751 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657657657658 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.95797058 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.545454545 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22374964786 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781909039127 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0252168673755 0.071462118173 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124086166961 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00901232391184 0.0609392437508 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.82 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.