College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
College students should have the option to pursue subjects that interest them, which would be most advantageous towards their future careers and skill building. Choosing subjects that are more interesting allow college students to narrow their focus on their interests that can ultimately be turned into potential careers. While it can be argued that adopting the recommendation may not be advantageous, it does not degrade the fact that college students have the potential to shape their futures with something they love to do.
College students that pursue subjects that interest them have the ability to focus on a career they may be diligent to pursue to do after graduation. For instance, a college student who does well in math and has more interest in solving equations and using formulas would have a higher likelihood of choosing math classes that may prepare the student for potential careers, such as being a business manager, architecture, or engineer. A college student that loves science would be interested in taking science courses, such as chemistry, biology, and physics. Interests in those subjects can also lead the student to potential jobs, such as being a nurse, doctor, or health practitioner. Therefore, if students choose subjects that interest them, then they have the ability to turn that fond interest into a career they can be passionate about instead of being miserable.
In addition to being able to pursue a career of interest, students who choose their own subjects of interest are capable of honing their skills. For instance, if a student who is very good at art is interested in taking art classes, the student will be able to advance in skills such as painting, drawing, and sculpting. Likewise, a culinary arts student can advance their skills by choosing courses of interest, such as the art of chopping or how to develop an exquisite recipe, which are most vital skills for becoming a chef. Hence, by choosing subjects that can not only be turned into careers, a student is able to develop and master skills required for the workfield.
On the other hand, it can be argued that choosing subjects of interest may not be advantageous as the recommendation may hinder a student from being open-minded and developing other essential skills for the workforce. For instance, if a student is only interested in taking math courses, then the student misses out on learning other subjects that can help lead to potential jobs. Subjects, such as psychology and public speaking, are also vital to job applications. No matter where a student launches his or her career, it is crucial to know how to speak with people, since the real world is multifaceted in scenarios of human interaction. Hence, the student misses out on the opportunity to enhance their skills and becomes narrow-minded. However, adopting the recommendation would be more advantageous as students can build other skills along the way of studying and preparing for their future careers, such as taking internships and extracurricular activities that can expose them to develop social skills.
In conclusion, it is crucial that students take interest in subjects that can lead them to potential careers they may learn to love and become professionals. While it may be advantageous to take courses that lead to jobs, it undermines the college student’s ability to flourish in a field they may love. Besides, who would want to work in a field they don’t love for the rest of their lives?
- Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your 62
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 66
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 50
- The following appeared as part of a business plan developed by the manager of the Rialto Movie Theater Despite its downtown location the Rialto Movie Theater a local institution for five decades must make big changes or close its doors forever It should f 70
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well being of the societies and environments in which they operate Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations provided they operate within the law is to make as mu 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arts'' or 'art's'?
Suggestion: arts'; art's
...ng, and sculpting. Likewise, a culinary arts student can advance their skills by cho...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, hence, however, if, likewise, may, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.4196629213 209% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 25.0 11.3162921348 221% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2917.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 575.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07304347826 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89685180668 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80751139389 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.387826086957 0.4932671777 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 884.7 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1261447299 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.904761905 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.380952381 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2380952381 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239986174621 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100899831424 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575963563705 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167408059624 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459656219361 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.