As a result of advances in medical care, average life expectancy is increasing for men and women. Do you think most people will see this as a positive development? What are the disadvantages of an ageing population for individuals and society? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations.
Recently, the phenomenon of "as a result of advances in medical care, average life expectancy is increasing for men and women" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that an aging population might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that advances in medical care can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the medical standpoint, increasing average life expectancy for people can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that living more years and being healthy are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the estimation of life expectancy. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both new surgery techniques and sophisticated treatment methods distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of climate science, without the slightest doubt, increasing average life expectancy as a result of advances in medical care might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of aging. Moreover, fundamental aspects of increasing the world's population can relate to the reality that the demerits of environmental damages can pertain to human activities. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of climate change as a result of the growing population were correlated positively with greenhouse gas emissions the local authorities would ultimately address positive developments of medical care. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of being green.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of advances in medical care and increasing life expectancy far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-30 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-07-19 | craigh | 80 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | Dinuka Dissanayaje | 65 | view |
| 2017-11-05 | maryam2 | 69 | view |
- Business whether big or small is to maximize profit Do you agree with that Give your opinion 49
- Mass media including TV radio and newspapers plays a pivotal role in shaping our opinions and characters What is your opinion 88
- the maps below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers What factors do you think influence these decisions Do we become used to bad news Would it be better if more good news was reported 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
..., fundamental aspects of increasing the worlds population can relate to the reality th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73154362416 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21968630348 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604026845638 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 379.143842365 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.741632085 50.4703680194 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.272727273 104.977214359 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339192644121 0.242375264174 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109349164789 0.0925447433944 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792252917343 0.071462118173 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193179519837 0.151781067708 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665606012132 0.0609392437508 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 12.6369458128 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.69 53.1260098522 35% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 10.9458128079 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.65 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.