Government should allocate resources prior to the technology research, do you agree or disagree? Give your own experience and examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of "governments should allocate resources prior to the technology research" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that the resource allocation by governments might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that funding the technology research can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the economics standpoint, allocating resources prior to the technology research can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that funding new research and achieving good results are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of governmental budgets on research methods. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both spending money for technologies and inventing the sophisticated instrument distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of science, without the slightest doubt, allocating resources prior to the technology research by governments might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of wasting resources. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the resource allocation can relate to the reality that the demerits of controlling by governments can pertain to limiting the publication of research results. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of the federal funding were correlated positively with the independent researching, the local authorities would ultimately address research issues. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of the research quality.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of allocating resources prior to the technology research far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-30 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2019-07-21 | bashirheidari | 88 | view |
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The first chart bellow shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 67
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Do you think English will remain to be a global language despite globalization 88
- The information revolution has changed the way of mass communications and had some negative and positive effects on individual lives as well as on society To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1207.87684729 146% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 6.04467353952 5.00649968141 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37720098199 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601374570447 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 379.143842365 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.7390144846 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.909090909 104.977214359 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4545454545 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300541250712 0.242375264174 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114382462959 0.0925447433944 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676851638412 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186985936211 0.151781067708 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290720487376 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 12.6369458128 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.71 53.1260098522 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 10.9458128079 155% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.05 11.5310837438 157% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.06 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 55.0591133005 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.