Many people support the use of animals for testing medicines for humans. Others believe it isn’t appropriate to use animals for such experiments. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Many researchers and scientists adopt experimental procedures that involve subjecting animals to some human-like diseases before injecting them with some chemicals in order to determine the effectiveness of new medicines while observing possible side effects as well. They claim that they must do this to assess the risks that might arise when using these medicines later to treat humans. However, this is not a straightforward issue, as many debates are taking place between promoters and opponents of the idea of using animals in such painful tests. I tend to side with the proponents of using animals for testing new treatments. This essay will discuss both points of view and elucidate some examples that prove each one of them.
On the one hand, people who are concerned with animal rights have been repeatedly decrying all acts that involve using animals for testing. They claim that it is extremely cruel to subject such weak creatures to chemicals that might make them just writhe in agony to death for nothing wrong they had committed. To illustrate, a French laboratory, who had invented a new medicine for pneumonia, previously announced that the research team had consumed more than one thousand rats and monkeys during the testing phase of the new drug. For this reason, some people denounce all acts of using animals for testing new drugs.
On the other hand, well known research institutes assure that they do not have any safer way to reduce the risks of using new medicines directly on humans, other than observing the effect of these drugs on animals before inaugurating them to public use. Nevertheless, specialists state that the life of one rat or monkey can save thousands of human lives who might encounter very dangerous symptoms or residual effects as a result of consuming drugs with untested components. For example, one of the sought after treatments for a serious disease has recently failed to treat the symptoms and even yielded in the death of some of the animals that were tested. That drug would have caused many fatalities if it had been used to treat humans before being tested with animals. For this reason, I believe that using animals for treatment is very crucial to mitigate the risk of harming human patients.
To conclude, not all people approve the usage of animals for testing new drugs. While some people consider it a shame, others consider it inevitable.This essay discussed both views and concluded that testing new medicines on animals ,albeit being cruel and painful, can save the human race.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-05 | a7medelsayed | 56 | view |
| 2019-02-20 | VishvAdthakkar | 82 | view |
- Many people support the use of animals for testing medicines for humans Others believe it isn t appropriate to use animals for such experiments Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- One of the major problems that faces today s governments is creating enough satisfactory housing for their increasing populations whilst still trying to protect the environment Discuss this statement and give your opinion Give reasons for your answer and 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f using animals for testing new drugs. On the other hand, well known research i...
^^^
Line 3, column 624, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...mptoms and even yielded in the death of some of the animals that were tested. That drug wou...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 150, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
... a shame, others consider it inevitable.This essay discussed both views and conclude...
^^^^
Line 4, column 233, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ed that testing new medicines on animals ,albeit being cruel and painful, can save...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, so, well, while, for example, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2130.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 422.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04739336493 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56517326488 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511848341232 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.9 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.3989018423 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.125 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4375 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408490648717 0.244688304435 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160019030769 0.084324248473 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948356817329 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279173483367 0.151304729494 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199264766946 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.