Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
When it comes to friendship, there will always be a myriad of problems to be encountered. Whether maintaining relationships with old friends is more important than making new friends is inevitably an issue for everyone. After deliberating such an issue, I believe that the ability to make new friends easily will benefit us more.
First of all, the capability to make friends with people allows us to learn from each friend's traits. In other words, through chatting and knowing each other, sensing people's advantages can help up to compensate for our shortcomings. Besides, people with lots of friends tend to have the ability to deal with each kind of personality, which makes it rather easy for those people to succeed in their career.
Secondly, since our world has developed rapidly, the possibilities to encounter difficulties have risen at an unprecedented rate. To deal with this, the help of our friends can come in handy. When we are traveling alone in a foreign country, it is possible to meet any kind of problem. Fortunately, if we have friends nearby, then the problem may be solved fast and easily. Or else, we might be lost and helpless without knowing what to do.
Last but not least, having the ability to make a great number of friends can also lead us to a more satisfying life. This is because we will have friends with all kinds of hobbies and interests to join with. People who have a wide variety of interests tend to participate in events and activities in different fields. So, with those friends, we can easily find someone to company with. On the contrary, without those friends, we might have to do things lonely and being bored.
All in all, given the reasons above, the ability to make new friends easily is an indispensable trait in modern society. This allows us to solve our problems faster and easier. That is not to say that other opinions are out of merits. Nevertheless, I believe my points of view provided above are fully capable of firmly supporting my position.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs Many pterosaurs were very large some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were capabl 88
- Solutions to prevent injuries of glass to birds 76
- Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s Mars is 150 times further away from Earth than the Moon is Thus the project o 3
- In recent years many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live for example fro 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, kind of, first of all, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 346.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82369942197 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66418342089 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557803468208 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0404459332 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.45 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275229607661 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823715336996 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082831291613 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160056574939 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778805661265 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.