The graph below shows the percentage of workers in 5 different European countries with a day or more illness absence from 1991 to 2001.
The line graph illustrates the percentage of labors who have one or more days off because of health reasons in five European nations, in the 1991 2001 period.
Overall, it can be seen that UK and Germany’s data remained appropriately the same while that of Netherlands, France and Sweden was volitate during the research.
In particular, there was only 2.5% of UK workers that was absent from workplace because of illness in 1991. After 10 years, this number didn’t change much. The similar phenomenon happened to Germany’s line, which consecutively accounted for the lowest position in the graph, with about 1.5% each year.
Regarding another three lines, they were significant changes. France witnessed the most significant decrease from 5%, the highest percentage in the first year, to 3% in 2001. On the contrary, the number of Nederland’s absent workers overcame France’s and constantly constituted the largest proportion of the graph until it reached the peak of 5.4% in 2001. The second-highest number in 2001 was Sweden, which increased steadily at 3% in 1991 and climbed significantly in 1995 to reach 4.5% in 2001.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-12 | Piyush Somani | 64 | view |
| 2021-01-12 | Piyush Somani | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-14 | uhthnim | 85 | view |
- The picture below shows how a hot balloon works Summerize the information by selecting 56
- Detailed description of crimes a newspaper and TV can have bad consequences on society So this kind of information should be restricted on media However some people think it provides useful information to help people stay alert What are the advantages and 84
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graphs below show the size of ozone hole over Antarctica an the production of three ozone damaging gases from 1980 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 59
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, so, while, in particular, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21857923497 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89495798747 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655737704918 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7639572093 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.111111111 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252989478311 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891803944694 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784027057212 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135674736567 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880022478902 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.