Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants. Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home. Which do you prefer?
Nowadays, one of the most complex and controversial issue is where is a better choice for a meal. People, because of their different demands such as the budget or the preparing time for a meal, may hold different views. Some people think that eating at food stands or restaurants is convenient whereas others believe that eating food at home is economical. In my perspectives, I prefer to eat at food stans or restaurants as following reason.
First of all, eating at food stands or restaurants is more convenient and can save a lot of times. That is to say, eating outside means that you just need the money and to decide which restaurant you want to eat. You wouldn’t take too much time for a lunch or dinner. So you can have more time to do other things you want. For example, when I was in college, I tried to prepare the dinner by myself one time. First, I searched the recipe for the tomato sauce spaghetti and decided what ingredients needed to buy. Finished shopping, I went home, prepared the ingredients and then cooked the spaghetti. After dinner, I even had to wash the dishes and cleaned up the kitchen. It took me almost two hours for whole dinner process. It really shorted my study time. Finally, I realized eating at food stands or restaurants is a effective way for me, so that I will have more time to prepare for the classes and hang out with my friend rather than prepare and eat food at home.
Furthermore, eating outside means that you have wide choice for the meal. In other word, there are various food style restaurants on the street. Your taste will not be limited because of your cooking skill. For instance, I like to eat Japanese food such as Shushi, sashimi or Ramen, but it is really difficult for me to deal with fishes or cook the vinegar rice. Thus, when I want to eat Japanese food, I will go to Japanese restaurant. Eating at restaurant will not strict your choice for the meal.
To sum up, based on the above reasons, I prefer to eating at food stands or restaurants. Because it doesn’t waste my time and I can eat whatever I want.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-05 | fvtfff | 90 | view |
| 2022-05-05 | Rustin_Panda | 76 | view |
| 2022-01-05 | archerlao | 76 | view |
| 2021-09-20 | nida fatima | 70 | view |
| 2021-09-05 | nida fatima | 66 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People communicate with each other less than in the past because of the popularity of television Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 76
- Do you think people in the past are more friendly than they are today 60
- Students are more interested in politics than they were in the past Agree Disagree 33
- There are many news stories about a current event that helps people take a break from reading or listening to the news for a few days or weeks It is beneficial to stop reading and listening to the news for a few days or weeks Do you agree or disagree with 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: It's a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 820, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...eating at food stands or restaurants is a effective way for me, so that I will ha...
^
Line 4, column 52, Rule ID: PREFER_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'eat'?
Suggestion: eat
...based on the above reasons, I prefer to eating at food stands or restaurants. Because ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... my time and I can eat whatever I want.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, really, so, then, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, such as, first of all, to sum up, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48930553193 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510582010582 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0668499637 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.9565217391 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4347826087 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5652173913 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.448812696023 0.236089414692 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127537492998 0.076458572812 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143048193471 0.0737576698707 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302724344088 0.150856017488 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0948322565047 0.0645574589148 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 11.7677419355 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.52 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.