Nowadays people have more choices than their ancestors, whether in the filed of lifestyle or eating preference. In this fast- paced world, more and more people in high-demanding job positions tend to eat outside their home. Luckily, widespread technology and a prosperous commercial economy enable people to have the same delicious meal in restaurants. However, this phenomenon also triggers a hot debate about whether people should spend more time eating food at home or just eat at restaurants. Were I forced to choose, I prefer to eat at restaurants. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will elaborate on in the following passages.
First and foremost, eating outside will save people a lot of time, especially for people who don't know how to cook or have very tight schedules. For people who have no interest in cooking, the whole process is demanding and tedious. After a long day of work, these exhausted people just want to have hot meals immediately, so eating in a restaurant is the best choice. My sister's experience can be a compelling example of this argument. She has poor cooking skills and needs to work almost 10 hours a day. She tried to eat at home for a while, but it would occupy her only free time. Now she constantly eats at restaurants. She not only saves more time on other meaningful things, but can also have a better eating experience.
Secondly, eating at a restaurant will provide people with food of higher quality. We have to realize that unlike their parents, nowadays youngsters have poor cooking skills. Rather than cooking, eating outside can provide them with better food.
Admittedly, there are some possibilities that eating at home is more beneficial. Food safety is one of the pressing issues for eating out. Some types of street food or fast food are not healthy or even produced in an unclean environment. But when the government promulgates more relevant laws, we believe that the problem of food safety will be solved smoothly
In conclusion, based on what has been discussed above, I prefer eating outside for it's convenience and high quality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... lot of time, especially for people who dont know how to cook or have very tight sch...
^^^^
Line 7, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ood or fast food are not healthy or even produced in an unclean environment. But ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, i feel, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9323943662 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70393190896 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560563380282 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7920140048 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.380952381 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9047619048 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348526158753 0.236089414692 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112678250056 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788279940719 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193923424335 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507765035947 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.