Public entertainers play a significant role in society from a cultural standpoint. It is a common belief that celebrities mint money. Although it wouldn’t be fair to generalize this but it most cases it turns out to be true. I happen to believe that they deserve such compensation and have favorable impact on the community. In this essay, both views would be discussed followed by a conclusion.
Entertainment industry encompasses professions such as singers, politicians, sportspersons, actors or even social media influencers. Be it a game of football or an arena filled with thousands of fans, sportsman like Cristiano Ronaldo (highest paid footballer) and Katy Perry (billionaire singer), tend to influence masses with their action on and off the field. They inspire us for a better future and fills the space as escape from boredom or monotony through concerts, movies or exhibition events. However, these very performers put in copious amount of hard work, training and rehearsals to bring out a ‘show’ in front of the audience. This solely qualifies for high remuneration that usually comes in this industry. To further support my point, we should also consider the short life span of their careers as compared to occupations like doctors, engineers or accountants.
On the other side, it is pertinent to talk about negative impact that entertainers tend to have on a society. With the amount of influence a celebrity wields coupled with fan following on social media, anything and everything they depict tends to get imitated. The most glaring example is that of Kim Kardashian who might have unknowingly promoted plastic surgery propagating insecurity among the youth. It is suggested that media should take a center stage in generating awareness of such presumptions.
In conclusion, I would like to reinstate that entertainment profession involves significant risk and shorter life span career which makes their effort even more valuable and hence they deserve to be paid appropriately. After all money is the bigger motivator and ensures a good supply of talent in future.
- Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead Discuss both views and give your opinion 68
- It is not necessary to travel to other places to learn the culture of other people We can just learn much from books films and the Internet Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people believe that entertainers are paid too much and their impact on the society is negative while others disagree and believe that they deserve the money they make because of their positive effect on others Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 296, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...tor and ensures a good supply of talent in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, after all, even so, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26646706587 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00366855905 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637724550898 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8777398277 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.470588235 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6470588235 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52941176471 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189876451934 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512114832553 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550656017292 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110197074468 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391006711361 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.