The pie charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
These pie charts compare water consumption of six areas that is used in three parts; industry, agriculture and household usages.
With the first glimpse, it is almost obvious a high consumption of water in agriculture part. Except that of Europe with 32% and North America with 39%, water consumption in other areas is more than 70%. However, the most consumption of water in agriculture belongs to Central Asia with 88%.
The second part which consuming more water is for industrial uses which is too different in these six areas. Clearly, the first rank is for Europe with 53% and followed by North America with 48%. In contrast, South East Asia, Central Asia and Africa have the least amount of water consumption for industry with less than 12%.
Remarkably, domestic uses are in the low level of consumption compared to that of two other parts. All countries consume water less than 20%, especially Asia with the least amount of 7%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-24 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-24 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | Fahim Shahriar Khan52 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | Eshana Pokhrel | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | Nowshin Tabassum | 67 | view |
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 76
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 783.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92452830189 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49714840731 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553459119497 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 15.9427989859 43.030603864 37% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.0 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138511721574 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677634751614 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569442589346 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104645970248 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591145898128 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.