Some schools believe that children should learn typing rather than a good handwriting. How far do you agree with that? Show reasons with your experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of "some schools believe that children should learn to type rather than a good handwriting" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that learning to type for children might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that having a good handwriting can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the education standpoint, a good handwriting can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that the ability to write and increasing the knowledge of students are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of children's handwriting. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both handwritten assignments and traditional learning methods distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of science, without the slightest doubt, learning to type rather than a good handwriting might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of technological issues. Moreover, fundamental aspects of learning to type can relate to the reality that the demerits of spreading the use of handheld devices can pertain to the progress of technology. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of typing were correlated positively with handwriting, the local authorities would ultimately address the interest of children in schools. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of learning a good handwriting alongside typing.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of a good handwriting far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-30 | sattar_iust | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-09 | Rish | 73 | view |
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 84
- Effective learning requires time comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment Study and employment distract one from another To what extent do you think the statements are realistic Support your opinion with examples 88
- Computer and online games should be banned to students in schools as they have no educational value What s your opinion 85
- Do you think that young people should be restricted on certain things that they can do such as driving or smoking until they reach the age of 25 What are your views on this 49
- Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of differential education i e splitting students into different classes according to their academic performance 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35280769571 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618055555556 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.5117821454 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.545454545 104.977214359 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322455134064 0.242375264174 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105484598005 0.0925447433944 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064551972133 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165189267195 0.151781067708 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730392777101 0.0609392437508 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 12.6369458128 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.