The bar chart depicts nation's exports value in different categories in 2015 and 2016 which is supported by a table which shows percentage change during those years. Overall, it can be seen that Petroleum products contributed the most while Textiles contributed the least. Moreover, it also can be seen that Textiles experienced biggest percentage change while Agricultural products encountered the lowest percentage change.
Petroleum products was in the first position with contribution of approximately $60 billion in 2015 and about $62 billion in 2016. Following Petroleum products was Engineered goods which stood at around $58 billion in 2015 before encountered 8.5% change to about $62 billion in 2016. The next was Gems and jewellery, which contributed around $45 billion in 2015, before fell slightly to approximately $40 billion in 2016.
Agricultural products became fourth category to contribute to export earnings with approximately $30 billion contribution in 2015. The number then increased 0.81% to around $31 billion, which made the least percentage change among other categories' percentage changes. In the last place was Textiles which stood at about $23 billion before had a huge change of 15.24% to approximately $38 billion. This change was the biggest amid other groups' percentage changes.
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as unsatifactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do you think that the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...illion contribution in 2015. The number then increased 0.81% to around 1 billion, wh...
^^^^
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'categories'' or 'category's'?
Suggestion: categories'; category's
...the least percentage change among other categories percentage changes. In the last place w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1097.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.485 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00615618357 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9978845293 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.7 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260811314579 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123538284674 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118550877477 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190863236026 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587997913133 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.