The table compares the number of overseas tourists who visited five different regions in the years 1990,1995,2000 and 2005.
It is obvious that the international visitors were increasing between 1990 and 2005. Europe attracts the most tourists in each year while relatively fewer people paid a visit to middle east over the shown period.
In 1990, 280.2 million people visited Europe, which was nearly 5 times as high as that of the second most visited region, Asia and the pacific. Over the following decade, the number of Europe visitors sharply grew to 390.3 million and then a slight increase to 400.2 can be seen in 2005. By comparison, the growth of Asia and the pacific tourist was more consistent, going up from 80.3 million in 1995 to 135.8 million in 2005.
With regards of the other three countries, America ranked third with 80.5 million overseas tourists in 1997, and this figure went up to 113.2 million at the end of the shown period. In contrast, a marginal increase can be seen in the figure for Africa and middle east, with 28.7 million and 15.8 million people traveled to these two areas in 2005 respectively.
- There are social medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones What forms do they take Do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phone 84
- Currently many people fail to balance the work with the other parts of lives what are the reasons and how to solve it 84
- The bar chart below shows percentage of adult of different age groups in the UK who used the intern everyday from 2003 2006 78
- In recent years the pressures placed upon students in school and university is increasing and they are pushed to work hard from a young age Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- The following line graph shows the changes of average monthly salary and prices of black and white TV in Japanese Yen from 1953 to 1973 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, then, third, while, as to, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86597938144 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.433186258 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587628865979 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0204669156 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220594192476 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101637515672 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815644824241 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14815084767 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752070869035 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.