49. The chart below shows the spending ( in million ) by 18-20 year olds in one country on five different products in 2010 and 2014.
The bar chart compares the money allocated on 5 different types of products by teenagers in one nation during the period of 4 years, which began in 2010.
In overall, it is clear that while food and smartphone experienced an upward trend and books saw a significant decline during the whole period, the other 2 types ‘ figures remained unchanged throughout the years. Moreover, it was food that received the highest amount of budget in both 2010 and 2014.
In 2010, food dominated the first place with more than 3500 million dollars, and this figure continued to grow in the next 4 years, accounting for nearly 4500 millions in 2014. Starting with 2000 million dollars of expenditure, smartphones also saw a significant increase by more than 1000 millions in 2014. In contrast, books, which accounted for 1000 millions in 2010 before experiencing a slight decline, ended up with the lowest position in 2014.
The trend was totally different when it came to the other 2 kinds of products. While the figure for clothing remained unchanged at 2500 million dollars during the whole period, cars also saw the same trend at 2000 millions.
- Some people think that the best way to reduce time spent in travelling to work is to replace parks and gardens close to the city center with apartment buildings for commuters but others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- As countries develop more and more people buy and use their own cars Do you think the advantages of this trend for individuals outweigh the disadvantages for the environment 80
- The graphs below show the changes in age structure of population in a European country from 1901 to 1981 and a projection in 2021 78
- Nowadays people s life is changing rapidly and as a result family relationships are affected Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that money is better spent on human population To what extends do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, so, while, as to, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9375 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56165297654 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.400483089 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165976497744 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785154454736 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511205816622 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100830838693 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582631169273 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.