The bar chart provides information regarding the frequency of having meal in fast food restaurants among the USA people in three different years (2003, 2006, 2013).
At first, the bars have approximately a normal distribution, and also some similar patterns in related years. For example, in three groups of data sets (everyday, once or twice a month, never) eating fast food fell in the year 2006 in contrast with the 2003, and then climbed by moving from the year 2006 to 2013 in the category of once or twice a month. Furthermore, it leveled off after seven years in everyday and never using fast food restaurants. By contrast, in other groups of data ( several times a week, once a week, a few times a year) the patterns reversed, meaning it rose from the year 2003 to 2006 and then decreased in 2013 among people eating several times a week or once a week. Furthermore, for former group, the figure stayed at the same level in 2013 in contrast with 2006 in never used categories.
The second, once or twice a month with once a week were the most popular ones among clients in three different years and the figures of people fluctuated between 25% to 32.5% respectively. Also, we can put the data of several times a week and a few times a year in one group in terms of their almost similar marks that were between 15% to 20% and 12.5% to 20% respectively. Finally, people eating fast food everyday and others who never had eaten, fluctuated between 3% to 4% and 4% to 5% respectively.
To conclude, it seems that in some groups of data, there were a periodic upward-downward or vice versa trend among people, and sometimes it experienced no noticeable change.
- Using a computer every day can have more negative than positive effects on young children To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 61
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 78
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 67
- You have recently moved to a different house Write a letter to an English speaking friend In your letter explain why you have moved describe the new house invite your friend to come and visit 11
- You are unhappy about a plan to make you local airport bigger and increase number of flights. You live near the airport.Write a letter to your local newspaper. In your letter-explain where you live-describe the problem-give the reason why you do not want 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...r example, in three groups of data sets everyday, once or twice a month, never eating fa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 403, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...re, it leveled off after seven years in everyday and never using fast food restaurants. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts. By contrast, in other groups of data several times a week, once a week, a few...
^^
Line 5, column 408, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ively. Finally, people eating fast food everyday and others who never had eaten, fluctua...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, regarding, second, so, then, for example, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 295.0 196.424390244 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65423728814 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62348354304 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48813559322 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 408.6 283.868780488 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.7652540237 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.3 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.7 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18723041039 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088151085777 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0963129229316 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139670327211 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122188751571 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.