The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth.
The culture of any era is defined by a variety of elements and may be the result of past influences.
Analyzing the trends of today's youth is only one of those elements. One also needs to analyze the
kinds of work that adults are pursuing or the activities its senior citizens are participating in. To rely
solely on analysis of youth trends is short-sighted. The youth of a culture are heavily influenced by the
latest, hottest fad. Their greatest need is to fit in, to be cool, and they change their clothes, their hair,
and their phones as soon as the newest fashion is featured in print or on television. Their permanence
is ephemeral, and their influence may be longer lasting. A big chunk of their time would be spent just
keeping up. Anyone attempting to analyze the trends of youth will barely finish before the trends
change.
The most widely-exposed youth culture of the last half century is that of the 1960's and 70's. The
youth of that era advised others to tune in, turn on, and drop out. Drugs, sex and rock and roll
permeated the culture of youth in those decades. Because burning draft cards and bras was so widely
publicized, it would be tempting to believe that all youth behaved in that manner. That would be a
mistake. Despite the presence of SDS chapters, peace rallies and sit-ins on college campuses across
the country, most students quietly went about attending classes, graduating and getting traditional jobs.
The counterculture of the 60's and 70's had its greatest influence on later decades. Those days of
rebellion and revolution led to increased opportunities for minorities and women. The young people
of that era are now nearing retirement and are living lives very different from the senior citizens of
previous generations. They have tuned in, but they have not dropped out. They are healthier, better
educated, and leading more active lives than their parents or grandparents did.
Analysis of youthful trends reveals what effect advertising had on a culture's young people. To fully
understand contemporary culture, one must analyze the hopes, fears, and actions of all the groups that
comprise it. A culture's youth is blissfully ignorant of a culture's realities. The struggle of adults to
find satisfying work, to pay the bills, to provide
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-31 | shahajan999 | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-17 | Inchara A | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-17 | Inchara A | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Dipesh1234 | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-03 | TiOluwani97 | 66 | view |
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth 50
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems 50
- Most people are taught that loyalty is a virtue But loyalty whether to one s friends to one s school or place of employment or to any institution is all too often a destructive rather than a positive force 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 20, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'Anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'attempts'.
Suggestion: attempts
...would be spent just keeping up. Anyone attempting to analyze the trends of youth will bar...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 68, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a culture' or simply 'cultures'?
Suggestion: a culture; cultures
... reveals what effect advertising had on a cultures young people. To fully understand cont...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 23, column 16, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cultures'' or 'culture's'?
Suggestion: cultures'; culture's
... of all the groups that comprise it. A cultures youth is blissfully ignorant of a cultu...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1932.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 385.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01818181818 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67020566874 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563636363636 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.902567039 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.5 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0416666667 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.916666666667 5.21951772744 18% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 23.0 4.97078651685 463% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.83258426966 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318301728584 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826341071847 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853791489889 0.0758088955206 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079161919862 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0878456590282 0.0667264976115 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.