The illiterates of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn. Agree or Disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of "the illiterates of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that the ability of reading and writing might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the ability of learning can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, the ability of learning for the illiterates can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that increasing the awareness of people and literature are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of reading and writing for children. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both being a literate and knowledge can be observed.
Within the realm of science, without the slightest doubt, the illiterates of the 21st century might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of learning processes. Moreover, fundamental aspects of being an illiterate can relate to the reality that the demerits of learning methods can pertain to the lack of schools. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of technologies of the 21st century were correlated positively with the learning, the local authorities would ultimately address decreasing the number of illiterates. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of literacy.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to support the idea that the merits of the illiterates of the 21st century and the ability of learning far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-19 | honorrr | 88 | view |
| 2020-12-09 | Behnaz fallah | 85 | view |
| 2020-09-23 | sattar_iust | 85 | view |
| 2019-02-23 | VanithaE | 78 | view |
| 2018-01-30 | anuvijay | 80 | view |
- What do you think are the strengths and weaknesses of the education system in your country Use your own experience to support your idea 85
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Television serves many functions Watching TV makes us relax We can learn knowledge and information from TV programs Besides TV can also be seen as a companion To what extent do you agree with this 77
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which my be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Government should allocate resources prior to the technology research do you agree or disagree Give your own experience and examples 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53666666667 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.175424731 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.3778874824 50.4703680194 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.0 104.977214359 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371327844211 0.242375264174 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115400900302 0.0925447433944 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160313247415 0.071462118173 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195345671169 0.151781067708 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.161006534332 0.0609392437508 264% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 12.6369458128 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.