The chart below shows the amount of spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following chart illustrates how much money is spent on six different goods by four distinctive European countries of Germany, Italy, France, and Britain.
As can be clearly observed from the chart, six different goods are surveyed. First of all, CDs and photographic film, which have similar pattern amongst four countries. Britain spend the most money on these goods which are more than 170000 and a bit more than 100000 pounds, respectively. Followed by France, with more than 160000 of photographic film and around 160000 in CDs, Italy with nearly 155000 and about 150000 in a row, and Germany by about 145000 in both categories.
Turning to personal stereos and perfumes, nearly the same amount of money is spent by Germany, Italy, and France on stereos which is approximately 150000 thousand pounds, while the share of Britain is around 150000 and 100000 on stereos and perfumes. However, French people spend far less money on tennis racquets, by virtually 140000, in comparison with about 150000 of other three countries. The story of toys is completely different. Britain’s populace buys more the 160000 pounds of toys and the same amount is spent by France and Italy (a bit less than 160000). Meanwhile, Germans spend far less money on toys than other three countries.
Overall, it is clear from the chart that, in all six consumer goods, the maximum amount belongs to Britain, although German people spend the least amount in all categories except perfumes. The spending pattern of Italy and France are rather similar to each other in toys, personal stereos, and perfumes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-27 | sattar_iust | 67 | view |
- Some people see prisons as the place where criminals should be punished while some people think their primary function should be to teach them how to lead better lives What is your opinion about the main function of time spent in prison punishment or reha 90
- A good listener is better than a good talker in a social situation Do you agree or disagree 80
- Some people believe that exploring outer space is important because it expands human knowledge and might lead to discoveries that will benefit humanity in the future Other people believe that space exploration is a waste of money that could be better spen 88
- Hosting sporting events such as the Olympics and the World Cup can bring benefits to the host countries How far do you agree with this statement Use your own examples to support 69
- It is important for children to take extra classes or play after school Discuss both and give your opinions 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 177, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'spends'.
Suggestion: spends
...pattern amongst four countries. Britain spend the most money on these goods which are...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 177, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Britain) must be used with a third-person verb: 'spends'.
Suggestion: spends
...pattern amongst four countries. Britain spend the most money on these goods which are...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 965.302439024 138% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09578544061 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50355511232 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494252873563 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 367.2 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.957511163 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.833333333 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58333333333 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132877054001 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531116279535 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648447860852 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106951895374 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680250844318 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.