The bar chart compares the number of cell phones and landlines for every 100 people in selected nations.
It is noticeable that in Denmark the number of phones and landlines which are owned by people is much higher than the remaining countries.
In Canada and the US, from the data, it is clear that people who live there prefer to have more landlines than mobiles. And the number of mobiles per 100 people in these nations is almost half of the number of landlines they own. In contrast, people in Uk, Sweden, and Italy have approximately double the number of landlines they have per 100 people.
For every 100 people in Germany, there are 70 mobiles and the number of landlines is just 10 less than the number of mobiles. And in Denmark, the number of landlines for every 100 people is near to 100 while phones are available with just 80 out of 100 people in the country.
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words
- An increasing number of schools provide tablets and laptop computers for students to use in school replacing books and other printed materials like exams and assignments What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 89
- The chart below shows the number of girls per 100 boys enrolled in different levels of school education Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 67
- Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth which can cause tooth decay High acid levels are measured by low pH values Describe the information below and discuss the implications for dental health 78
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 728.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5786163522 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28430928412 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 72.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452830188679 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 14.5686271817 43.030603864 34% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.0 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385268638772 0.215688989381 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.215730789179 0.103423049105 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875435326757 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260982011513 0.15604864568 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756992336986 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.