Some people say that e books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magzines to what extent do you agree or disagree

It is often argued that sooner or later with the advancement of technology there will be a lot of things that may substitute daily newspapers and monthly magazines. Although I agree that in the future this thing can be replaced by several options like e-books and all, I think despite this evolution, newspapers, and magazines still may sustain in this fast-paced world.

On the one hand, the current enhanced technology can offer a wide range of benefits which a person seldom can get them with regular newspapers. Firstly, it provides advanced features like translation which can't be provided with general books. Secondly, irrespective of a person's financial background they can access a variety of contents as most of the e-books and other content sites are free sources. For instance, people often spend more time on online resources for reading any topic than in the traditional way. Thus, with the vast development of technology people widely replace daily newspapers and magazines and would prefer e-books and other new improvements.

On the other hand, there are feasible reasons that ensure newspapers and traditional media can survive in the long run. Because the contribution of the production and distribution industries of these newspapers and all in the country's economy is big enough. And it was claimed in some survey that 70% of aged people always give priority to general reading than using advanced technologies. Besides, traditional reading doesn't affect health especially people who suffer from eye problems and they love to read in this way. Even though what level may the technology gets developed, there are inevitable reasons for chances of not finding the perfect replacement for traditional newspaper and magazines.

To sum up, I believe that recent accomplishments in modern technology may be an option but it can't be a better substitution for traditional media.

Votes
Average: 9.5 (4 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...lthough I agree with that in the future this things can be replaced by several optio...
^^^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...dvanced features like translation which cant provided with general books. Secondly, ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...hnologies. Besides, traditional reading doesnt affect health especially people who suf...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 95, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...dern technology may be an option but it cant be a better substitution for traditiona...
^^^^
Line 7, column 95, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...dern technology may be an option but it cant be a better substitution for traditiona...
^^^^
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...etter substitution for traditional media .
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, for instance, i think, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25913621262 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86950096496 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601328903654 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3859703658 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.769230769 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216961975875 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718346813188 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458484906604 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1233575053 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298294602504 0.056905535591 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.