The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The given line graph depicts the data for waste production in tonnes by three different companies from the year 2000 to 2015.

Overall, it is conspicuous that at the start of the period maximum waste was produced by the company A. However, at the end of the period company C was the highest producer of waste.

It is clear from the graph that company A registered the decreasing trend over the period. In the year 2000, it produced 12 tonne of waste, which then decreased significantly to almost 8 tonne in the year 2015. Similarly, company B also faced reduction in waste production but it increased from 2000 to 2005. Production of waste by company B increased from around 8 tonne in 2000 to almost 10 tonne in 2005. Then it decreased drastically to 3 tonne in the year 2015.

On the other hand, company C registered the upward trend throughout the period. In the year 2000, there was 4 tonne of waste produced by company C which then achieved the highest and increased to 10 tonne in the year 2015.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-12-13 Wardiati Yusuf 60 view
2023-08-23 Phuong1810 70 view
2023-08-23 Phuong1810 view
2023-08-22 dorae 84 view
2023-05-29 hieu13092006 67 view
Essays by user v.jindal2904@g… :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of the period maximum waste was produced by the company A. However, at the end of...
^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'tonne' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'tonnes'.
Suggestion: tonnes
...eriod. In the year 2000, it produced 12 tonne of waste, which then decreased signific...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'tonne' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'tonnes'.
Suggestion: tonnes
...hen decreased significantly to almost 8 tonne in the year 2015. Similarly, company B...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'tonne' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'tonnes'.
Suggestion: tonnes
...te by company B increased from around 8 tonne in 2000 to almost 10 tonne in 2005. The...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 395, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'tonne' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'tonnes'.
Suggestion: tonnes
...rom around 8 tonne in 2000 to almost 10 tonne in 2005. Then it decreased drastically ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'tonne' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'tonnes'.
Suggestion: tonnes
...005. Then it decreased drastically to 3 tonne in the year 2015. On the other hand,...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'tonne' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'tonnes'.
Suggestion: tonnes
...e period. In the year 2000, there was 4 tonne of waste produced by company C which th...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 200, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'tonne' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'tonnes'.
Suggestion: tonnes
...chieved the highest and increased to 10 tonne in the year 2015.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, similarly, so, then, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58563535912 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56536893887 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430939226519 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.575410919 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.0 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209623663693 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109254995286 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431788985953 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155753886027 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0104780068919 0.0819641961636 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.8 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.