Companies should provide sports and social facilities for local communities.
To what extent do you agree?
Companies often have strong influence on the people living around them. Some people hold that businesses should give local communities sports and social facilities. I completely agree with them because this can tremendously benefit both the companies and the groups.
Providing sports and social complexes for local residents either for profit or for free can be beneficial to the companies. There are endless demands for service of sports centers and buildings such as hospitals, schools and nursing homes. Therefore, with proper business strategies, there might be various chances for businessmen and businesswomen to generate profits from these fields. Moreover, even in the case that this is a free contribution they want to make to regional communities, not only multiple local governments are willing to offer them a tax cut to encourage other businesses to follow their examples, but also numerous potential customers and clients who live there may be attracted to their brand names with positive impressions.
Local communities can also gain benefits, namely meeting their demands for, such as, logistics or education and improving employment rate, from these companies’ actions. With the investment from the private sector in a free market, new key social and sports establishments such as new roads, fitness centers and universities can both diversify the choice of the public with various qualities and prices for their services and reduce overcrowding in state-owned facilities. Additionally, the investors of the facilities may recruit original residents for the building and operation of their organizations, thus cutting the unemployment rate in the area. For instance, in research published in The Economist last month, a plan for building a bridge, on average, can create more than 1000 jobs for a medium state in America.
In short, in my opinion, we should stimulate the providing of sports and social facilities for communities by local businesses because both the communities and companies can obtain mutual interests from this activity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | linh allie | 67 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | linh allie | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | HaleyLin2000 | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | HaleyLin2000 | 56 | view |
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam How true do you think this statement is What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars 73
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam How true do you think this statement is What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars 78
- Some people get into debt by buying things they don t need and can t afford What are the reasons for this behaviour What action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem 73
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 73
- Many people think that to become a successful specialist it s better to choose a career early in life and never change it later To what extent do you agree with this view Support your opinion with relevant examples 44
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in short, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51735015773 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94064859254 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586750788644 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.7773117064 49.4020404114 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.75 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4166666667 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308316032908 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125278603547 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102539665959 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22337304317 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080464596559 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.