some people believe that people who read books can develop more imagination and language skills than those who prefer to watch TV. Do you agree or disagree?
Some people think that reading for pleasure increases people’s imagination and language skills more so than watching TV. However, I strongly agree that learning through watching TV is more effective than reading.
On the one hand, watching TV is alive in terms of image and sound. After that, when audiences watch a tourism channel, they are exposed to a wide range of knowledge by seizing images of worldwide landscapes or feel tastes of specialties in various geographical regions. For example, we can see the Eiffel tower or Phu Si mountain in front of your eyes without going out there. Secondly, the role of TV in studying language is pivotal. Recent English programs not only support audience to remember words easily by associating them with vivid images shown on the screen but easily learn to listen through videos on youtube. For example, the children can easily study English through songs and listen to fairy tales through video on Youtube.
On the other hand, reading for pleasure brings benefits to the readers. When reading, the readers have to use their creativeness to comprehend the concept and the context delivered in the book. Also, reading can enhance the language, especially in reading and writing. When we reading books, this has helped them better understand of grammatical and lexical usage.
In conclusion, I believe that watching TV is a more efficient way for people because of the individual’s development of verbal abilities and imaginative thinking.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-04 | Elenochka315 | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-13 | gurwindertoor | 87 | view |
| 2020-10-03 | mina123356789 | 56 | view |
| 2018-11-21 | namhero1997vn | 100 | view |
- some people believe that people who read books can develop more imagination and language skills than those who prefer to watch TV Do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people regard the video games as harmless fun or even as a useful educational tool Others however believe that videos games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them In your opinion do the drawbacks of video games outweigh the benefits 56
- People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life What are those problems Should the government encourage people to move to regional towns 61
- Nowadays there is a trend that reports of media focus on problems and emergencies rather than positive development some people think it is harmful to individuals and to society To what extent do you agree or disagree 71
- The development of tourism contributed to English becoming the most prominent language in the world Some people think this will lead to English becoming the only language to be spoken legally What are the advantages and disadvantages of learning one langu 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tand of grammatical and lexical usage. In conclusion, I believe that watching T...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1251.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 241.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19087136929 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70393005719 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630705394191 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2820438585 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2307692308 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5384615385 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280388425841 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984856978579 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116139099365 0.0667982634062 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202578778127 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139884966638 0.056905535591 246% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.