It is evident that modern technologies change human life significantly. The Internet is one of the biggest benefits of this change that provides mankind with endless information, proper communication, and entertainment. Therefore, a considerable number of people think that the internet can replace the face-to-face communication that I partially agree with.
On the one hand, even such developed technology cannot deliver the feelings and emotions accurately, which enhances relationships significantly. Additionally, there is no proper internet connection or equipment in some countries. Therefore, communicating on the internet is not the option for them yet. Furthermore, it is easier to keep privacy during face-to-face communication than Internet communication.
On the other hand, nowadays, technology improves extremely fast and unpredictably. It creates a lot of opportunities for mankind. People can talk with each other from any part of the world, which has the proper internet connection with applications like Skype, Discord, WhatsApp, or Facebook. These apps provide opportunities like video call, voice call, or text messaging with several touches. Changing the background, adding special effects are extra features of them. Additionally, having a conversation in the virtual world is easier for introvert people, or conversation with technological devices is easier for people who have hearing handicaps.
To conclude, although face-to-face communication delivers feelings and emotions better, communication via the internet spreads every day, and it provides a lot of extra opportunities and easiness. Therefore, I partially agree with the idea that face-to-face contact will wear out.
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- An increasing number of professionals such as doctors and teachers are leaving their own poorer countries to work in developed countries What problems does this cause What solutions can you suggest to deal with this situation 78
- The dangers of smoking are well known yet many people continue with this habit What are the causes of this How can we reduce smoking in society Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 78
- Some people think that a car is the best way to travel in cities while others believe a bicycle is a better way Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- With an increasing population communicating via Internet and text message face to face communication will became a thing in the past To what extent do you agree 56
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat face-to-face contact will wear out.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, therefore, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.02459016393 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45090728443 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594262295082 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.832509498 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2666666667 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26666666667 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293132030334 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963062187206 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106888890525 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204824256861 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0984667159507 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.34 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat face-to-face contact will wear out.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, therefore, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.02459016393 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45090728443 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594262295082 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.832509498 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2666666667 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26666666667 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293132030334 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963062187206 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106888890525 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204824256861 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0984667159507 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.34 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.