The bar chart illustrates the results of a survey conducted regarding the levels of employment amongst men and women in 6 different countries throughout a 10-year time period.
Overall, it becomes evident that the percentages of male and female employees in all countries have witnessed a dramatic increase from 1995 to 2005. However, the number of men occupied in 2010 remains relatively higher than the corresponding ratio of women working.
Looking at the graph in more detail, Iceland and Switzerland are the two countries with the highest rates of male employees in 2010 (close to 83% and nearly 78% respectively). The number of workers with respect to the remaining four countries (Australia, the UK, New Zealand, and the USA) during the same period is approximately the same at around 70%.
On the other hand, Switzerland, the UK, and the USA are the largest employers for women in both 1995 and 2005 (figures fluctuate from 60 to 68 percent in 2005) with Iceland, Australia, and New Zealand following.
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave energy machine and its location 78
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen Is it positive or negative development 78
- In many countries women and men are working full time It is therefore logical for women and men to share household works To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1991 and 2007 Summarize the information by describing the main features of the charts and making comparisons where appropriate Write at least 150 words
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both theseviews and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... fluctuate from 60 to 68 percent in 2005 with Iceland, Australia, and New Zealand...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, regarding, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06586826347 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83370857064 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616766467066 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.7344160662 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.0 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8333333333 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 5.23603664747 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117882609222 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554442824896 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340213321859 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0684373822022 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142284683788 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.