Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Job is an essential part of our life. In order to become economically healthy we need to do work. Apart from that, keeping time for enjoyment is also paramount importance. Some jobs have more weekdays to work but little work hours other jobs have more hours to work but less number of weekdays- someone would agree with this, others would not. In my view, it is more enjoyable to work less number of weekdays but long hours for the following two important reason.
The main reason is that long work hour but less workdays enhances to pass a more free time with family members. Passing more time with family is a bonanza because it helps to curb the jobs tight schedules and also create a room for good family relationship. For example, my cousin is working in a pharmaceutical company where he worked four days 12 hours per day. He has a lots of work pressure and not enough time to give his sons, daughters and parents. But, after four hectic days, he used to go a long trip with his family and he gets many time to pass with them. As you can see that, although working less number of days but more number of hours is tiresome but, actually it provides more time for family wellbeing and persons work stress out.
Another reason is that, the less days and more work hours also helps the person to earn by doing another job. When, one job is not enough to support the family, then such advantages is a kind of relief. For instance, a few years ago I was joining in a multinational company where I was earned a little amount of money and it was very hard for me to support my joint family. But, there was one advantage I got from that company, it has provided 3 weekdays off. So, I worked another company as a part time employee. And it enabled me to burgeon my income and kept the wrist of my family haul tightly. This experience taught me that, to get the chance to work another company due to short number of weekdays work is beneficial for the poverty driven person.
In conclusion, although it is possible to argue by citing the benefits of working less hour but more weekdays but in reality it will not avail more benefits. Working less weekdays provides not only shape a good family relationship but also offers another way to meet the financial needs. So, we should be considered the more benefits to work less number of days.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship Use specific examples and reasons to support your opinions 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Professors benefit from appearing on TV 65
- In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recycling materials Companies that receive 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 44, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun workdays is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... main reason is that long work hour but less workdays enhances to pass a more free t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 372, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...rked four days 12 hours per day. He has a lots of work pressure and not enough time to...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 540, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'many times'.
Suggestion: many times
...a long trip with his family and he gets many time to pass with them. As you can see that,...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 29, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun days is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ess out. Another reason is that, the less days and more work hours also helps the...
^^^^
Line 6, column 495, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
... off. So, I worked another company as a part time employee. And it enabled me to burgeon ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 167, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun weekdays is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...t will not avail more benefits. Working less weekdays provides not only shape a good...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, so, then, well, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1918.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47086247086 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3331784714 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477855477855 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 598.5 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2255545406 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3333333333 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353818628768 0.236089414692 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108027351077 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816921459813 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220775827975 0.150856017488 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841866416817 0.0645574589148 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.