Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is undeniable that having a good, enjoyable, and stressless job is not an easy thing, specially these days, but you can adjust some things to make your current job more enjoyable. I believe that having a job where you work three days a week for long hours will be more enjoyable than a regular job, where you have to work five days a week for shorter hours. I think this way for several reasons, which I am going to explain in the following assay.
To begin with, working for less days means that you are going to be able to save many daily expenses, such as gas, cloth, and food or lunch expenses. People usually feel that those money are not that much, but if they make a monthly summation they will find that they might be enough to go on a trip to another city or at least to spend a night in a five stars hotel. Consequently, having a three days schedule affers an opportunity to enjoy or in different words to be able to afford a small vacation. In fact, I experienced this thing personally last year when I switch my schedule to a three days rather than five. I was able to save enough money to buy disney land tickets for my whole family. We went there, and spent seven daysplaying and having fun without thinking about how expensive this trip was. In response, my little daughter told me that I am the best mom ever. To be honest, her words made my day, and erase the previous overwhelmed work days.
Second, three days job means four days off. this way of working gives a flexibility to enjoy more time with family and friends. For example, previously, I was not able to enjoy my days off, because I spent them doing my house chores, buying groceries, and helping my kids in there school things. Recently and after the swiitch, I have time for every thing. The first two days will be for cleaning and finishing my home tasks, and the rest will be to have fun with my beloved ones.
To sume up,I strongely believe that three days job are regarding the long shifts are more enjoyable than five days job. it is not only because it helps in saving money, which people can spend in intresting things, but also it offers more family or friends time. That is why I suggest that all companies should have this choice in there policies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- Some people think that human needs for farmland housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals Do you agree or disagree with this point of view Why or why not Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Most of the biggest problems in the world will be solved in the next few decades Use details and examples to support your 76
- TPO 47 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life 60
- TPO53 Do you agree or disagree It is more important for governments to spend money to improve internet access than to public transportation 60
- Olive trees 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun days is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...wing assay. To begin with, working for less days means that you are going to be abl...
^^^^
Line 2, column 33, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...assay. To begin with, working for less days means that you are going to be able to ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 175, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'those moneys', 'those monies'?
Suggestion: this money; those moneys; those monies
...unch expenses. People usually feel that those money are not that much, but if they make a m...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 656, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... I was able to save enough money to buy disney land tickets for my whole family....
^^
Line 3, column 44, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...nd, three days job means four days off. this way of working gives a flexibility to e...
^^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., I have time for every thing. The first two days will be for cleaning and finish...
^^
Line 4, column 11, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , I
...ve fun with my beloved ones. To sume up,I strongely believe that three days job a...
^^
Line 4, column 120, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... are more enjoyable than five days job. it is not only because it helps in saving ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, regarding, second, so, at least, for example, i think, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1827.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.38129496403 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25946626269 2.67179642975 85% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539568345324 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.396376782 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1578947368 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9473684211 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42105263158 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42446539295 0.236089414692 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124239206287 0.076458572812 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153602640177 0.0737576698707 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283990124445 0.150856017488 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.157391628316 0.0645574589148 244% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 58.1214874552 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.12 10.9000537634 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.