The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries
The given graph compares the proportion of the individuals 65 and above in Japan, the USA, and Sweden from 1940 to 2000 and envisages the percentage for the next two decades until 2040.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that although Japan witnessed the least percentage as compared to the USA which was at the highest position at the start, the same is expected to override others in the coming years.
According to the given illustration, to begin with, nearly 9% and 7% of the total population were the aged people in the USA and Sweden respectively, compared to 1 in every 20 people in Japan. In the next two decades, whilst the USA(10%) and Sweden(8%) rose steadily at a similar pattern, Japan observed a sharp plummet before reaching a plateau at 3% until 1990.
In contrast, the USA and Sweden experienced an upward trend prior to leveling off at 15% until 2000. Thereafter, Sweden followed by an erratic pattern, surpassed the USA and is predicted with second-highest rank, reaching a quarter, up by 5% than the USA. However, Japan will outweigh the others to reach a peak of 28% by 2040.
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 78
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 78
- The Chart below show the distribution of families with children by employment status 87
- The diagram below shows how the water cycle works 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, second, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81538461538 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71003201167 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.611603983 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.142857143 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8571428571 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0790312863329 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404471154193 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594004478796 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0585006548587 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678337097051 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.