The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
The given line graph details the pattern of visitors( in millions), who headed to the Caribbean island and stayed on the cruise ships and the island. The complete survey is done over a period of seven years from 2010 to 2017.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the total number of visitors kept on rising significantly. Although stay on the island remained popular among the visitors, cruise ships gained major popularity during the end period.
According to the given illustration, exactly one million people visited the island during the starting year. With the passing time, the number rose by two-fold and climbed to 2.6 million before getting leveled off to the same number between 2015 and 2016. After that, a dramatic increase pushed the figure to a peak value of 3.5 million by the end of the period.
With regard to staying, more than half a million visitors preferred an island stay as opposed to just 0.3 million who went for the cruise ships in 2010. Although the former got stable to .7 million until 2011, an upward trend in the latter rose the value by 0.5 million. Over time, the island's demand observed a continuous rise to attain stability at 1.5 million in 2017, whereas after experiencing a tipping point, the cruise bookings surpassed the island's demand by half a million and reached 2 million in 2017.
- The diagram below shows the steps of processing cocoa beans 78
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports center now and how it will look after redevelopment 84
- Describe the pingo island as is given on the map in the year 1990 which is now car free 78
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, whereas, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89224137931 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40845700207 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577586206897 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.108075235 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184955681196 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718350789049 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500343838964 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117276001752 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549842798399 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.