It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighbourhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why?
Long ago restaurants were considered an important aspect of socialising and it has been since then. For this reason, I think the building a new restaurant would bring a lot of excitement and opportunities, especially for the local people who will be tasting an authentic flavour that they have never tasted before, this new project will be beneficial for the zone, whereas it might bring some liabilities.
Firstly, the city would have a new income. It will open job opportunities for those who love cooking and serving. The new restaurant will create a different atmosphere for the city attracting more tourists to the area, making them interested in it. The local shops will be seen by more people. Of course, the new restaurant would be likely to get his ingredients and supplies from the city creating new revenues.
Secondly, new restaurants try to create an impact on people's lives by being flexible with their food. That is why it comes with options menus: Vegetarian, seafood, and steak. And with a cuisine of: Italian, French, and America. Offering a varied number of food, and flexibility to serve all the desires without any difficulty. Giving the chance to disgust pleasant meals from other countries since every country has its way of cooking using a particular ingredient.
The liabilities that this new restaurant may cause for instance: noisy hours; every restaurant normally operates from 8 am to 12 pm, and normally people expend more than 3 or 4 hours on dinners. Less parking space; since our community depends on parking street which means if people would be gathering in the same spot every night for the persons who live nearby it would affect them making it harder to find parking space.
Delivering a restaurant might cause some doubt for a few people but the idea of having something new to try is exciting. Plus, there are plenty of people that would love to discover new tastes. Others would like to meet new people and invite them for breakfast, lunch, or dinner. It is always a good option.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-02 | prakriti malla | 70 | view |
| 2020-10-19 | Uhernandes95 | 76 | view |
- What change would make your hometown more appealing to people your age Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 70
- How building were used for chaco Canyon people in New Mexico 60
- It is becoming increasingly popular to have a year off between finishing school and going to university What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 70
- People attend college or university for many different reasons for example new experiences career preparation increased knowledge Why do you think people attend college or university Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Workers who prefer to work four days a week instead of the current hours 71
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...specially for the local people who will be tasting an authentic flavour that they have nev...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... or dinner. It is always a good option.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, whereas, for instance, i think, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 344.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91569767442 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.620679439 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587209302326 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.7996061215 48.9658058833 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9444444444 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169498713126 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053309582215 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458526037547 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985026278155 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300106494034 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...specially for the local people who will be tasting an authentic flavour that they have nev...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... or dinner. It is always a good option.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, whereas, for instance, i think, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 344.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91569767442 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.620679439 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587209302326 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.7996061215 48.9658058833 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9444444444 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169498713126 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053309582215 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458526037547 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985026278155 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300106494034 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.