Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently
while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people say that when recruiting, companies must aim to take people who are innovative and able to work independently. On the other hand, others who are willing to follow rules and regulations, can work together and perform as one team.
Indeed, recruiting companies must ensure that they recruit the correct candidate for the specific job that they are advertising for since if they recruit the wrong person it could be a disaster for the company. Therefore, prior to recruiting the professional qualifications and work experience need to be verified in order to prevent such a mess from happening. The companies who recruit innovative and independent individuals can develop their products and services while coming up with new ideas.
Comparatively, there are some companies who should recruit individuals who are able to work together as a team, these sorts of candidates are ideal for large manufacturing companies, franchises and garment factories are some of the examples. For an example if we take multinational companies, they must adhere to strict quality control processes to keep to the international standards given by the parent company.
Talking about employees who work with companies that recruit creative and who can work freely will have a career growth and will come up with new ideas to benefit the organization. When it comes to large multinational company’s career growth opportunities available for employees will be minimal.
In conclusion, companies should recruit their staff based on their vison and mission. Briefly, companies that maintain the same manufacturing procedure should focus on recruitment prioritizing team workers who are able to follow the instructions on the other hand companies looking to expand their products and services should give priority to recruit innovative and independent workforce
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-24 | Patrick_17 | 77 | view |
- The majority of television news 77
- Employees play an important role in the development of a company and help achieving its monthly targets and yearly budgets and the overall success of the company relies on is employees 65
- Some people think that zoos are cruel and all the zoos should be closed However other people think that zoos are useful to protect the rare animals 55
- Company s top level authorities should get their Employees in decision making 70
- Some people think that when recruiting companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions Discuss both views an 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 500, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ervices while coming up with new ideas. Comparatively, there are some companies ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...s, franchises and garment factories are some of the examples. For an example if we take mul...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, if, look, so, therefore, while, as to, in conclusion, talking about, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 6.10837438424 246% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 5.94088669951 252% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54545454545 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05685605121 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524475524476 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.0 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.8505824823 50.4703680194 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.181818182 104.977214359 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.63636363636 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.483574691959 0.242375264174 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182718146959 0.0925447433944 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1247171975 0.071462118173 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270546123115 0.151781067708 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108505136166 0.0609392437508 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.