It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
In the last decades, it is more common that people have different and flexible workdays. This is a heated debate that recently employers have attention to know having a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. In my opinion, as I experienced and learned it's better for me, I prefer three workdays for long hours. I am going to explain three potential reasons with examples to clearly convince you.
First of all, when you are at work for long hours, you are more focused on the subject you are working on and doing tasks while you don't have distractions. For example, I remember when I was working in a company that I was responsible for making a presentation for clients, it was really helpful to be there in that atmosphere so I could easily and effectively work and do my tasks. thus, when you are in the atmosphere and with your co-workers it's beneficial for you to be more focused.
Secondly, when you know you have your wanted free time during the week so you can easily plan for the rest of your life. It is not easy to illustrate what I mean exactly because it is too general a topic. For instance, there were days that I had to work six days a week so I just had one day left for me to spend on my hobbies and stuff like that. Early after working in that company, I started feeling depressed and blue since I just had to be in there. In response to that, I quit my job and start a new era in my life means working as a freelancer to have my own flexible workdays.
Finally, last but not least, having a job with fewer workdays is effective for both sides, employees, and employers. To clear this point of view, I am going to explain it more. These days people are working so quickly to respond to the market demands and they constantly have to empower themselves. Since employees have more leisure time, they are able to spend much time to improve their skills and also learn new things about how to be more effective.
In conclusion, as I mentioned above, I strongly believe that having fewer workdays is better. You are able to focus on your job while you are there and also have a high spirit because you can have your personal life besides your career and also be updated and sophisticated. Those reasons were my opinion and I believe they are convincing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- he archaeologist proposed that vessels were ancient electric batteries and even demonstrated that they can produce a small electric current when filled with some liquids 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The extended family grandparents cousins aunts and uncles is less important now than it was in the past 70
- Technological progress has made us lazy (Agree/disagree) 80
- Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 73
- employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 133, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...re working on and doing tasks while you dont have distractions. For example, I remem...
^^^^
Line 2, column 383, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...y and effectively work and do my tasks. thus, when you are in the atmosphere and wit...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, if, really, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, i mean, in conclusion, you know, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 72.0 43.0788530466 167% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.36136363636 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42017070465 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468181818182 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 610.2 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1907850662 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1578947368 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94736842105 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.551237992031 0.236089414692 233% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151212370101 0.076458572812 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.172056148859 0.0737576698707 233% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.314294069491 0.150856017488 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.178552768832 0.0645574589148 277% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 10.9000537634 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.