The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
The two diagrams depict the transformational changes that Grange park has undergone recently and the influence of these reconstruction works on how the park looks now in comparison with original appearance in 1920.
As could be noticed from the maps, the overall infrastructure has changed significantly. The brand new amphitheater for musicians has been introduced in the west-side of the park that once was the home for the simply-constructed stage for musicians. The second progressive development is the situation of the Rose garden with places for seats circling it right in the center of the park, to the left of the musical amphitheater. This renovation replaced the fountain and allowed visitors to take pleasure of listening to music while observing astonishing roses.
Looking at the East side of the grange park now, one can distinguish that the Glasshouse constructed in 1920 was replaced by a picturesque water feature. This particular change has made the overall appearance of the park wilder and created the cool needed in summers from the water. What is more, Rose garden in the upper left side just in the Arnold Avenue was demolished and replaced by the Café, while the playground area for children has superseded the pond for water plants.
Overall, the aforementioned changes not only better served the need of the park visitors but also created an amazing place in the town. The well-developed infrastructure was also the result of introduced developments.
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 84
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station 67
- The CoffeeCart beverage and food service located in the lobby of our main office building is not earning enough in sales to cover its costs and so the cart may discontinue operating at GBS Given the low staff morale as evidenced by the increase in the num
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 78
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 356, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rights'?
Suggestion: rights
...arden with places for seats circling it right in the center of the park, to the left ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, second, so, well, while, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23529411765 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15583981001 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584033613445 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8905857136 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.6 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139153285464 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556028536929 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052420127506 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943374402131 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398338031427 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.